Bill Browder

I suspect that Bill Browder is a deep state agent who went to Russia after the collapse of the Soviet Union to collude with bad people to defraud  Russia of hundreds of millions of dollars.  The lawyer was murdered but how do we know that the Russian government did it?  I’m looking for the articles I read that claimed the lawyer was ready to turn state’s evidence and that the oligarchs that Browder was in bed with murdered the lawyer to shut him up.

Bill Browder: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

BILL BROWDER: Hillary’s bagman and ex-American oligarch wanted by Russia for stolen $400 million that went to Clinton campaign

Clinton’s link to Putin is the underreported ‘dossier’ bombshell

On a related note, Putin made a point during the Helsinki conference that no one noticed.  Just because Soros is an American does not mean that America is to blame for his global meddling.  Maybe the Intelligence agencies are correct (which isn’t guaranteed because they have their own agendas) and it was Russians who were members of the GRU.  Does that necessarily mean that they were acting on behalf of the Kremlin and/or Putin?

If we damn the Putin because of the actions of some GRU agents, then shouldn’t we also damn Obama because of the actions of some FBI agents?


QAnon and Pizza

My dearest friend,

What are your thoughts on the QAnon phenomenon?  If it’s a larp it’s a damned good one.  …Too good, perhaps?  It’s so good that it potentially crosses the line into psyops territory, so we may as well throw out the idea that it’s a larp and conclude that it’s either some sort of psyops or it’s legitimate.

Take this video.  The accusations against a school remind me of a similar situation that happened back in the 80’s.  Do remember the national outrage when that school was accused of satanic abuse back then?  In the early 90’s a friend of mine said that it was all bullocks, that there were no satanic, pedophilic cults and that it was all just projection.  But I’m not too sure she was right.

It depends on how we view our leaders.  If one thinks that they are the best, brightest, shining examples of humanity then how could they participate in something as abominable as pedophilia?  But if one thinks that they are human like everyone else, and that some humans have psychopathic traits and seek power over others, and that positions of power tend to attract those who desire power,  why is it so far-fetched to think that many people in positions of authority are involved in nefarious business?

There’s more than enough “anecdotal” evidence to lead one  to conclude bad things are going on.  In no particular order:

  • spirit cooking — how many of your average Americans are into this sort of thing?  Why are these politicians considered representatives when their interests/proclivities are so divergent from the populace’s?
  • podesta and associates profile pictures — a toddler tied up with duct-tape? Paintings of children undergoing torture?
  • the franklin affair — that went nowhere fast.
  • the pedophile rings — busted in europe and include medium-level officials
  • gannongate — never mind the accusations of child abduction and pornography, just why was Gannon admitted to the White House at odd hours?

All the best,



7 July 2018

Hey Democrats, Fighting Fair Is for Suckers

It was easier before Trump’s Presidency.  I disliked both liberals and conservatives equally (probably because I never thought too deeply about which side of the political spectrum I fell on; Government  was bad, ’nuff said.) and vocally opposed both the Democrats and Republicans… mostly the Republicans.  Both Parties are duplicitous but the GOP is worse because it’s blatantly hypocritical.  It’s candidates campaign on small government but always increase its size and scope when elected.  At least the Democrats are honest… they campaign on bigger government, higher taxes and a “free” lunch and deliver as much when elected.

Now, more and more, I find myself tolerant of and leaning towards the conservatives and Republicans, and despising the liberals and Democrats.  It’s not that I support the Republican party more than I used to.  It’s that the Democrats and Left in general are so bat-shit crazy that any refutation of their ideas inadvertently defends the Republicans.

Has the Left gone completely insane or are they finally showing their true colors?  Maybe the two aren’t mutually exclusive?  Their anti-Trump rhetoric has gone beyond the bounds of reason along with their belief that everyone who doesn’t agree with them is a nazi, fascist, xenophobic, homophobic, trans-phobic, misogynistic, white supremacist, racist bigot.

The article on that I linked to is a good example of this.

“If Democrats are wise, they will embrace President Donald Trump’s demonstration that there no longer are any unwritten rules in American politics…”

It’s about time that the right stop playing by those unwritten rules.  The left did so decades ago and it’s put the right at a disadvantage ever since.  As Saul Alinsky wrote, “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.”

We ought to be past surprise, for example, that the “let the people decide” standard invented by Mitch McConnell to block Merrick Garland’s Supreme Court nomination no longer applies now that Trump can choose a successor for Anthony Kennedy.

Wait, what?  How is it that it’s not “let the people decide” this time?  How is it more democratic to have a President in his eighth and last year of office pick a Supreme Court justice than it is to have a President in the second year of his first term do the same?

Maybe Rob Goodman is referring to the elections this November?  I hope not because I’d like to believe he’s smarter than that.  This country holds elections every two years.  If the President waited until every petty election concluded, he would get nothing done.

The people decided when they elected Trump as President, and a lame-duck President shouldn’t try to impose his will on the people.

And that’s just the first three paragraphs (I skipped over the second, which is so full of nonsense it’s staggering).  There’s so much to debunk in this article, but I have limited time and other sites to visit.

The overall flaw with the article is that the author presumes that American liberal democracy is a thing worth preserving.  At least half the country thinks it isn’t.  American liberal democracy has metastasized into socialism and that goes against the the principles this country was founded upon.

Rap Sheet: ***174*** Acts of Media-Approved Violence and Harassment Against Trump Supporters

Quick, look surprised.

3 reasons the American Revolution was a mistake

What scares me the most about this article is that there are people out there who take this seriously and agree with the author.

The Left Celebrates July 4 By Denouncing The First Amendment


23 June 2018 – Jubilee years

Jubilee years

I need to research the idea of a Jubilee year.  My current understanding is that it occurs every 70 years, it’s an idea from the Bible and therefore an ancient practice.

Compare the idea of a Jubilee year and Thomas Jefferson’s thoughts on the lifespan of laws and contracts.


Andrés Manuel López Obrador is an interesting candidate and I hope he wins the election.  His socialist/leftist/progressive ideas are worrisome but at least he’s something different.  He wants to Make Mexico Great Again.

Mexico is a different culture and a different country.  Its saviour will be different from America’s or England’s or Russia’s.  There will be different levels and kinds of religious elements.  There will be different levels and kinds of authoritarianism.

I’m not sure that populism is always bad.  When a small, elite group of people have seized control of all the levers of power and are manipulating them to their own end,  isn’t populism necessary and good?

Across the country, he would encourage construction projects that used hand tools rather than modern machinery, in order to boost the economy in rural communities

I think that is a great idea.  Modern machinery saves time and labor, but it’s not cheap.  Why not put people to work instead?  That gives them a steady income and something beneficial to do with their time.  It improves their standard of living and their quality of life at the same time.


What do politicians mean when they talk about “democracy”?  The opponents of AMLO keep talking about how his election would be a blow to the nascent “democracy” in Mexico and it  would set them back.  In 18 years (or whenever it was that PRI lost its stranglehold on the government) since “democracy” has come to Mexico things have gone from bad to worse.   And wasn’t this “democracy” the same one that was threatened every time things weren’t going PRI’s way?

“Democracy” is only brought out to bias and sway the conversation.  It’s not even a very good form of government.

How Many Fish In The Pond?

A fisherman casts his bait into the water and catches a fish.  How many fish are in the pond?  How big are the biggest fish?  What other types of bait are the fish willing to take?

I’m thinking about pizzagate and pedophiles and the dissonance in public opinion.  Why does everyone so readily and offhandedly dismiss pizzagate outright?  Why is it so hard to accept that there may actually be such dark things at the highest levels of authority and power?

Why is it that the average man is constantly under suspicion of being a pedophile?  No one questions a woman sitting on a park bench watching children in the playground but eyebrows are raised (at the least) if it’s a man sitting there.  And yet no one applies that same level of suspicion to the clergy or government officials.  People still implicitly trust them.

There was an uproar in the 1980’s because some children in preschool claimed they were victims of satanic abuse by their teachers.  And yet when there was a story in 1989 about a child prostitution ring with ties to the White House it fades into the night.  I remember seeing the headline and reading the article in the newspaper when it first came out, and it’s always bothered me that nothing came of it.

And what about that ring that was broken up a few years ago in… Brussels? Austria? Belgium?  I would swear that a few years ago I read about some sort of sex trafficking / pedophilia group getting broken up in the EU but I can’t find anything about it now.  I’ll link to it when I do find a reference to what I’m talking about.

Is Biden creepy?

I’m not sure now.  My gut response is yes.  The way he manhandled little girls is creepy.  But maybe I’m succumbing to the current bias against men.  Maybe he was just being “grandparently”?

6 June 2018

If you are a dog, the best legal status you can hope for is a police dog. In terms of liability they have almost none but value wise are treated no different than actual human cops in a lot of cases. For instance, if you decide to maul the face off the first person you see when you get out of the car and that person happens to be a “fellow officer” or innocent bystander you are given a “bad boy” and early retirement. However if you are in a situation with your handler and a guy with a knife and they release you to go attack him, the cops will kill this human as you run up to him because with knife in hand he is threatening another cop.

Also, if your human handler sends you to attack a person who naturally pummels the shit out of you, your handler can either use lethal force against him or if he doesn’t, can add additional charges for the suspect. Which of course is weird since we live in a culture that thinks it’s fine for the cops to empty a mag on ANY dog (regardless of size) that comes up to them.

Makes you wonder, doesn’t it? Because I am an ordinary citizen, my dog is merely property and it’s only worth is its replacement value. However, if my dog was owned by a police department it would be given a status superior to the ordinary citizen. If one does something bad to a police dog, the State will come down on one like a hammer. It would be as if one had killed an actual police officer.

Either this is a nation of laws or it is a nation of men. I see a lot of ridicule of the sovcit movement in this subreddit and LA. Most of the sovcit’s are idiots looking for a reason to get away with being a douchebag. But there is some truth to their protest.

For example, if the Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land then why is bringing it up in court considered contempt of court?

Either we’re free or we’re not. Government is created to protect the life, liberty and property of the individual citizens. At least, that’s the premise the US is based upon.

2018 May 26

Farmer accused of shooting murder blames gunfire on eggplant

I hope the farmer (Mr Russo) gets acquitted.  If the facts are correct, Mr Calandro deserved to get shot in the face.

Mutual friend Vince Vigliaturo told the court it “looked like (Mr Calandro) had splattered blood on his face.”

What does that even mean? That statement is completely out of context in the article. Was the blood splattered on Mr Calandro’s face the dog’s? His own?

Here’s the timeline according to the article:

  1. Mr Vigliaturo (a mutual friend) and Mr Calandro had arranged to go to Mr Russo’s farm in Tatura to pick up chillies.
  2. As Mr Calandro was driving out of Mr Russo’s property, he swerved towards Russo’s dog Harry, which was barking and running alongside his vehicle.  “David sort of swerved, and swerved away from the dog quickly,” Mr Vigliaturo said.
  3. Calandro ran the dog over.  He said “oops” then looked in the rear-view mirror and shrugged it off.  It was obvious that the dog was injured.
  4. Calandro and Vigliaturo went home.
  5. Russo called Vigliaturo 10 minutes after Vigliaturo and Calandro left Russo’s farm.
  6. Russo shot and killed Calandro.

I have some questions.

There are some details that have been left out so I have to fill in the cracks myself.  Who told Calandro that Russo wanted to talk to him?  Why did Calandro return to Russo’s farm?  Why did he bring his kids with him?

When all’s said and done…

Calandro deserved it.  He deliberately ran over a man’s dog while he was on that man’s property and then drove off.

But Australia is populated by a bunch of spineless cunts.  At least, that’s the impression I get from their judicial branch.  I expect that Russo will be sentenced to jail time and a crippling fine.

Such a shame.

2018 May 20

I’m watching the debate between  Stephen Fry, Jordan Peterson and Michael Dyson, Michelle Goldberg on political correctness.  I’m doing my best to be objective and listen to their argument but Dyson’s manner of talking bothers me.  I don’t like it.  The cadence is mesmerizing and his sentence structure and word choice seem purposed towards making himself sound intelligent while  confusing the audience.  He uses a lot of big words to sound important but say nothing.